ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Novel coronavirus causes coronavirus disease -19 (COVID-19). The hallmark is acute respiratory distress syndrome, but other system's involvement is less illustrated. Our goal was to evaluate the manifestation of COVID-19 on one of the overlaps of the cardiovascular and nervous system, namely: Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) and Orthostatic Hypotension (OH). METHODS: This single-center cross-sectional observational study encompassed 60 consecutive patients that were hospitalized and recovered from severe or critical COVID-19. At the time of discharge, Blood Pressure (BP), Heart Rate (HR) in the supine and upright position (1st, 3rd, 5th and 10th minutes) were measured. Symptomatic patients were reevaluated 2 months later. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 56.6 (±16.2) years and 42 patients were male (70%). The most frequent cardiovascular risk factor was hypertension (35%). OH and POTS were detected in 29(48.3%) and 10(16.7%) of the patients respectively at the time of hospital discharge. The mean age of patients with OH was higher than POTS and POTS was frequent in the elderly. Two months later among 10 patients with POTS, the sign and symptoms were resolved in 8(80%). Two (20%) patients who still had positive signs and symptoms of POTS were older than 65 years. Among 29 patients with OH, the signs and symptoms were resolved in 26(89.7%). CONCLUSION: In our study 65% of patients had OH or POTs on the day of hospital discharge, Complete recovery is gradual and needs several additional weeks. This is one of the aspects of the entity recently named "Long COVID".
ABSTRACT
[Figure: see text].
Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Global Health/trends , Aged , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Cardiac Electrophysiology/trends , Comorbidity , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac/trends , Female , Health Care Surveys , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Prevalence , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Time FactorsABSTRACT
To assess imaging data in COVID-19 patients and its association with clinical course and survival and 86 consecutive patients (52 males, 34 females, mean age = 58.8 year) with documented COVID-19 infection were included. Seventy-eight patients (91%) were in severe stage of the disease. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography. Mean LVEF was 48.1% and mean estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was 27.9 mmHg. LV diastolic dysfunction was mildly abnormal in 49 patients (57.6%) and moderately abnormal in 7 cases (8.2%). Pericardial effusion was present in 5/86 (minimal in size in 3 cases and mild- moderate in 2). In 32/86 cases (37.2%), the severity of infection progressed from "severe" to "critical". Eleven patients (12.8%) died. sPAP and computed tomography score were associated with disease progression (P value = 0.002, 0.002 respectively). Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) was significantly higher in patients with no disease progression compared with those who deteriorated (P value = 0.005). Pericardial effusion (minimal, mild or moderate) was detected more often in progressive disease (P = 0.03). sPAP was significantly lower among survivors (P value = 0.007). Echocardiographic findings (including systolic PAP, TAPSE and pericardial effusion), total CT score may have prognostic and therapeutic implication in COVID-19 patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/physiopathology , Echocardiography , Pericardial Effusion/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Blood Pressure/physiology , COVID-19/mortality , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pericardial Effusion/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Based on the epidemiologic findings of Covid-19 incidence; illness and mortality seem to be associated with metabolic risk factors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the association of metabolic risk factors and risk of Covid-19. METHODS: This study was designed according to PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers searched for the relevant studies using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The search terms developed focusing on two main roots of "Covid-19" and "metabolic risk factors". All relevant observational, analytical studies, review articles, and a meta-analysis on the adult population were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effect model for pooling proportions to address heterogeneity among studies. Data were analyzed using STATA package version 11.2, (StataCorp, USA). RESULTS: Through a comprehensive systematic search in the targeted databases we found 1124 papers, after running the proses of refining, 13 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of obesity in Covid-19 patients was 29% (95% CI: 14-47%). For Diabetes and Hypertension, these were 22% (95% CI: 12% 33%) and 32% (95% CI: 12% 56%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity in the estimates of the three pooled prevalence without any significant small-study effects. Such warning points, to some extent, guide physicians and clinicians to better understand the importance of controlling co-morbid risk factors in prioritizing resource allocation and interventions. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis showed that hypertension is more prevalent than obesity and diabetes in patients with Covid-19 disease. The prevalence of co-morbid metabolic risk factors must be adopted for better management and priority settings of public health vaccination and other required interventions. The results may help to improve services delivery in COVID-19 patients, while helping to develop better policies for prevention and response to COVID-19 and its critical outcomes.